Wind and Structures
Volume 36, Number 3, 2023, pages 175-200
DOI: 10.12989/was.2023.36.3.175
LES study of flow field and aerodynamic forces on a circular cylinder at Re=3900 with focus on grid resolution
Hongmiao Jing, Jitao Zhang, Qingkuan Liu and Yangxue Wang
Abstract
The large eddy simulation (LES) of the flow around a circular cylinder is not only affected by the sub-grid scale
(SGS) model but also by the grid resolution of the computational domain. To study the influence of different grids on the LES
results, the LES simulations of the flow around a circular cylinder with different grids at Reynolds number (Re) = 3900 was
performed. A circular computational domain with different radial growth rates and circumferential and spanwise grid numbers
was adopted for the simulations. Meanwhile, the aerodynamic forces, wind pressure coefficients, mean and instantaneous flow
fields, and the effect of grid resolution on them were comprehensively analyzed. The results indicate that the lift coefficient,
wind pressure coefficient, and recirculation length are significantly affected by the radial growth rate of the grid and the
circumferential grid number. The spanwise grid number has a significant influence on the three-dimensionality of the flow and
plays an important role in velocity fluctuations in the wake region. Nevertheless, the aerodynamic coefficients and recirculation
length are not sufficiently sensitive to the grid number in the spanwise direction. By comparing the results, it can be concluded
that suitable and reliable LES results can be obtained when the radial growth rate is 1.03 or 1.05, the circumferential grid number
is 160, 200, or 240, and the spanwise grid number is 64. A radial growth rate 1.05, circumferential grid number 160, and
spanwise grid number 64 are recommended to reduce the grid amount and further improve the efficiency.
Key Words
aerodynamic characteristics; circular cylinder; flow field characteristics; grid resolution; LES simulation
Address
Hongmiao Jing:1)State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures,
Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China 2)Innovation Center for Wind Engineering and Wind Energy Technology of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050043, China 3)School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
Jitao Zhang:School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
Qingkuan Liu:1)State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures,
Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China 2)Innovation Center for Wind Engineering and Wind Energy Technology of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050043, China 3)School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
Yangxue Wang:School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China