Steel and Composite Structures
Volume 56, Number 3, 2025, pages 193-206
DOI: 10.12989/scs.2025.56.3.193
Seismic performance of core-steel tube with T-shaped steel reinforced concrete columns
Peng Wang, Yang Tian, Qingxuan Shi, Chong Rong and Qiuwei Wang
Abstract
Combining the advantages of the concrete-filled core-steel tube (CFCST) column and cross-shaped steel reinforced
concrete (SRC) column, a novel core-steel tube with T-shaped steel reinforced concrete (CSTRC) column is proposed. The steel
skeleton of CSTRC column consists of a core-steel tube and four T-shaped steels welded around the steel tube. Seismic
performance of the seven composite columns are investigated by quasi-static tests, the effects of the cross-section form of core
steel tubes, the steel flange width, and steel web height of composite column are also investigated. A finite element model is
developed to conduct parametric studies to determine how the axial compression ratio, tube diameter-thickness ratio, concrete
grade and steel ratio affects the bearing capacity and ductility of the composite column. The test results show that the T-shaped
steel arranged outside the steel tube reduce the discrepancies in the mechanical properties of the concrete inside and outside the
steel tube and play a positive role in restraining the concrete outside the steel tube. Compared with the contrast column, the
CSTRC column exhibits good seismic performance, bearing capacity and ductility. With a ratio of flange width to section width
of approximately 9/25, the outstanding ductility of CSTRC column is exhibited. The bearing capacity and the ductility of
column decreases with the increase of axial compression ratio. The bearing capacity and ductility of the column improves with
the increase of diameter-thickness ratio. The bearing capacity of column improves with the increase of concrete grade and steel
ratio, while the ductility is decreased.
Key Words
confinement mechanism; core-steel tube with T-shaped steel reinforced concrete column; experimental study; numerical simulation; seismic behavior
Address
Peng Wang:1)School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi'an 710055, China
2)Key Laboratory of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance, Ministry Education (XAUAT), Xi'an 710055, China
Yang Tian:School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi'an 710055, China
Qingxuan Shi:1)School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi'an 710055, China
2)Key Laboratory of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance, Ministry Education (XAUAT), Xi'an 710055, China
Chong Rong:1)School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi'an 710055, China
2)Key Laboratory of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance, Ministry Education (XAUAT), Xi'an 710055, China
Qiuwei Wang:1)School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi'an 710055, China
2)Key Laboratory of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance, Ministry Education (XAUAT), Xi'an 710055, China