Steel and Composite Structures
Volume 54, Number 2, 2025, pages 175-190
DOI: 10.12989/scs.2025.54.2.175
Influence of bonding level on the bending fatigue behaviour of internal replacement pipe systems
Shanika Kiriella, Allan Manalo, Cam M. T. Tien, Hamid Ahmadi, Warna Karunasena, Patrick G. Dixon, Ahmad Salah and Brad P. Wham
Abstract
Internal replacement pipe (IRP) is a novel trenchless repair technology for rehabilitating legacy gas and oil
pipelines. The current knowledge of the behaviour of IRP systems under repetitive traffic loading is limited due to insufficient
research work. This study aimed to examine how the bonding level between the host pipe and IRP affects the flexural fatigue
performance of IRP used for repairing legacy gas pipelines with circumferential discontinuities. The investigation was
conducted using numerical four-point bending simulations under both pressurised and non-pressurised conditions. The influence
of the thickness and material properties of IRP and the magnitude of traffic loads are also explored. The results of the analyses
showed that the minimum fatigue life of all pressurised systems with any bonding level is primarily controlled by the tensile
failure of the bottom outer surface of IRP. Based on a loading configuration of 762-1016-762 mm (30-40-30 in), it has been
determined that unbonding 311.2 mm (12.3 in) diameter IRP from the host pipe to a length at least equal to the diameter of the
IRP from the discontinuity edge provides the longest service life for non-pressurised repair systems. Similarly, for all pressurised
systems, the longest fatigue life can be achieved by unbonding them to a length of at least twice the diameter of the IRP from the
discontinuity edge.
Key Words
Finite element analysis (FEA); flexural fatigue behaviour; fully bonded; host pipes; internal pressure; Internal replacement pipe (IRP); stress concentration; traffic loading; unbonded
Address
Shanika Kiriella: Center for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
Allan Manalo: Center for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
Cam M. T. Tien: Center for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
Hamid Ahmadi: Center for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
Warna Karunasena: Center for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
Patrick G. Dixon: Center for Infrastructure, Energy, and Space Testing, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Ahmad Salah: Center for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
Brad P. Wham: Center for Infrastructure, Energy, and Space Testing, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA