Steel and Composite Structures
Volume 43, Number 6, 2022, pages 785-796
DOI: 10.12989/scs.2022.43.6.785
Shear strength prediction of concrete-encased steel beams based on compatible truss-arch model
Yicong Xue, Chongxin Shang, Yong Yang, Yunlong Yu and Zhanjie Wang
Abstract
Concrete-encased steel (CES) beam, in which structural steel is encased in a reinforced concrete (RC) section, is
widely applied in high-rise buildings as transfer beams due to its high load-carrying capacity, great stiffness, and good durability.
However, these CES beams are prone to shear failure because of the low shear span-to-depth ratio and the heavy load. Due to
the high load-carrying capacity and the brittle failure process of the shear failure, the accurate strength prediction of CES beams
significantly influences the assessment of structural safety. In current design codes, design formulas for predicting the shear
strength of CES beams are based on the so-called "superposition method". This method indicates that the shear strength of CES
beams can be obtained by superposing the shear strengths of the RC part and the steel shape. Nevertheless, in some cases, this
method yields errors on the unsafe side because the shear strengths of these two parts cannot be achieved simultaneously. This
paper clarifies the conditions at which the superposition method does not hold true, and the shear strength of CES beams is
investigated using a compatible truss-arch model. Considering the deformation compatibility between the steel shape and the RC
part, the method to obtain the shear strength of CES beams is proposed. Finally, the proposed model is compared with other
calculation methods from codes AISC 360 (USA, North America), Eurocode 4 (Europe), YB 9082 (China, Asia), JGJ 138
(China, Asia), and AS/NZS 2327 (Australia/New Zealand, Oceania) using the available test data consisting of 45 CES beams.
The results indicate that the proposed model can predict the shear strength of CES beams with sufficient accuracy and safety.
Without considering the deformation compatibility, the calculation methods from the codes AISC 360, Eurocode 4, YB 9082,
JGJ 138, and AS/NZS 2327 lead to excessively conservative or unsafe predictions.
Key Words
concrete-encased steel; deformation compatibility; design codes; shear strength; truss-arch model
Address
Yicong Xue:School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710055, China
Chongxin Shang:School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710055, China
Yong Yang:1)School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710055, China
2)Key Lab of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance of the Ministry of Education, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710055, China
Yunlong Yu:1)School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710055, China
2)Key Lab of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance of the Ministry of Education, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710055, China
Zhanjie Wang:New Era (Xi'an) Design Engineering Co., Ltd, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018, China